- See Full Rules!
- Pick 2 of your stables.
- Tour Starts April 7th.
Points
(1st) 7-5-3-2-1 (5th)
Tour Details
Tour Details
NWRC Stables: sledge4 | wbrv | camry | rycamkel
Re: Tour Details
I'm going to try a couple new things with this version after a couple failed attempts to get it going early on. Although the rules weren't the issue, it was the activity/interest. I'd like to get at least 4 teams minimum.
- Reduce length of contest from 10 to 7 weeks.
- Create teams based on the Q1 div challenge standings.
Explanation:
1st change is obvious...less weeks may mean more folks stay interested.
2nd change is a shot in the dark to try and make the teams evenly matched. I will take the avg points from the Q1 division challenge of the 2 stables you wish to play with and rank together for each player. Then take the highest points earning pair (resident) and match him/her with the lowest. And so on...
Example:
#1 (Stable 1 = 125 points + Stable 2 = 117 points) = Avg 121 pts
#2 (Stable 1 = 110 points + Stable 2 = 100 points) = Avg 105 pts
#3 (Stable 1 = 90 points + Stable 2 = 80 points) = Avg 85 pts
#4 (Stable 1 = 60 points + Stable 2 = 50 points) = Avg 55 pts
The teams would then be residents #1 and #4 and then residents #2 and #3.
Make sense? Is that not a good idea? This way it's not a popularity contest or race to sign-up first and grab the next person who signs up.
Will
- Reduce length of contest from 10 to 7 weeks.
- Create teams based on the Q1 div challenge standings.
Explanation:
1st change is obvious...less weeks may mean more folks stay interested.
2nd change is a shot in the dark to try and make the teams evenly matched. I will take the avg points from the Q1 division challenge of the 2 stables you wish to play with and rank together for each player. Then take the highest points earning pair (resident) and match him/her with the lowest. And so on...
Example:
#1 (Stable 1 = 125 points + Stable 2 = 117 points) = Avg 121 pts
#2 (Stable 1 = 110 points + Stable 2 = 100 points) = Avg 105 pts
#3 (Stable 1 = 90 points + Stable 2 = 80 points) = Avg 85 pts
#4 (Stable 1 = 60 points + Stable 2 = 50 points) = Avg 55 pts
The teams would then be residents #1 and #4 and then residents #2 and #3.
Make sense? Is that not a good idea? This way it's not a popularity contest or race to sign-up first and grab the next person who signs up.
Will
NWRC Stables: sledge4 | wbrv | camry | rycamkel