**New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Get the late breaking news in the NWRC. From site updates, to important messages. This is the place to stay up on all the news.
sledge4
Site Admin
Posts: 3746
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:49 pm
Location: Upstate, NY

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by sledge4 »

If you don't have 5, you play your best "cards".

It should even itself out over the duration of the contest. I tend to shy away from letting people use any stable, because some residents only have a small handful and it wouldn't be fair against someone with 12 or whatever.

Some weeks you'll have more than 5, sometimes not.

Should I add a 3rd stable? Most have at least 3 stables.

Should I open it to any track?
NWRC Stables: sledge4 | wbrv | camry | rycamkel
lilbitfarm
Journeyman
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:30 pm

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by lilbitfarm »

I haven't had a lot of time to check this out but it seems as if having to get 5 entries from 2 barns running at NWRC tracks is too limited. How about everyone enter 3 barns (must be NWRC resident barns) and run at any track. With those conditions in mind I don't think trainers should be able to buy races for this contest. Makes it tooo easy and people that dont buy races wouldn't really have a chance. Just a few thoughts. Rich
helenamast
5 lb Apprentice
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:19 pm

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by helenamast »

what about if a person can not find a team mate and has only 1 stable?

My self I could use both my stables.
gocashbaby
Journeyman
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:00 am

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by gocashbaby »

I say go w/ 3 stables. 2 is too few to make a good "hand". :)
Nagnagnag
Journeyman
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:20 am

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by Nagnagnag »

i'm in different type of contest sure would be intertesting
Nagnagnag
Journeyman
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:20 am

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by Nagnagnag »

oh and I like lilbit's idea. run three barns but no buying or bid races. Play it straight if you will with no wilds :) real man's poker lol
Ron
Journeyman
Posts: 1417
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:31 pm
Location: Melville, SK. Canada

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by Ron »

:idea: What are the chances of getting some of the players with only two stables to go together as a team of three stables and those with more than two or three stables to go on there own...

Just a thought

Ron
sledge4
Site Admin
Posts: 3746
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:49 pm
Location: Upstate, NY

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by sledge4 »

I'm fine with solo or team participation. The only reason I did solo entrant is to get the numbers up.

If we had 10 members play and we did teams, in effect we only have 5 entries. But if it meant someone playing vs not playing, i'm ok with someone partnering. But the team would have to decide how to split the credits. Does the person with 2 stables get 66% of the winnings? The answer is probably yes, but it's just a point to be made.
NWRC Stables: sledge4 | wbrv | camry | rycamkel
sledge4
Site Admin
Posts: 3746
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:49 pm
Location: Upstate, NY

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by sledge4 »

Revisiting this contest again. Maybe some changes based on feedback. Also updated the prizes.

Let me know your thoughts.

Will
NWRC Stables: sledge4 | wbrv | camry | rycamkel
gocashbaby
Journeyman
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:00 am

Re: **New Contest** NWRC Hold'em

Post by gocashbaby »

I'm in but prefer NWRC races only to make it a little more difficult to get 5 aces ;)
Post Reply