RICHHow did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly????
-
lilbitfarm
- Journeyman
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:30 pm
How did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly????
I know we have tried this before but I am going to put it up every week, in an effort to get more communication within the res. Let's hear about how your horses stabled at MWRC(racing anywhere) fared this week--HAPPY NEW YEAR RICH
RICH-
lilbitfarm
- Journeyman
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:30 pm
Re: How did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly?
I'm off to a great start--that would be NWRC--please don't come down too hard on me. It is New Years Day and its possible I did have a couple of drinks last night. 
Re: How did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly?
You starting a "Midwest Racing Circuit"? LOL!!!
My 2011 started off: 10-3-0-3
All 3 wins were by just-turned 3yo's. Giving me some hope for a strong 2011.
My 2011 started off: 10-3-0-3
All 3 wins were by just-turned 3yo's. Giving me some hope for a strong 2011.
NWRC Stables: sledge4 | wbrv | camry | rycamkel
Re: How did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly?
This is not the way I wanted to start the New Year
18 - 1 - 5 - 1 - 3 - 1 & 7 Stinkers
My only win was a tie-breaker win by Change of Luck at 5/1 for the long shot contest which is good but one win out of eighteen runners is nothing to jump up and down about.
Maybe next week will be better
Ron
18 - 1 - 5 - 1 - 3 - 1 & 7 Stinkers
My only win was a tie-breaker win by Change of Luck at 5/1 for the long shot contest which is good but one win out of eighteen runners is nothing to jump up and down about.
Maybe next week will be better
Ron
Re: How did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly?
hmmmm - I started three horses this week - and two finished last or next to it and the other finished a badly beaten fourth. Things can only go up from there.
Re: How did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly?
2011....HERE WE GO THEN!!!
NWRC stables started off the New Year pretty well ...
Started 41 starters for - 7 winners, 6 seconds, 6 thirds, 10 in the top 5 and 12 also rans ... so all in all not a too bad of a start for that group of barns.
Accruing 455 bps in the 5 barns I ran was not a bad start ... inzamam barns posting 3 winners and hoarding 114bps, whilst zinzamam had two winners but amassed 133bps, with just 2 of the 9 runners not finishing in bp bearing positions.
Hope to improve with each week and hope you all can do the same!
Rharfo
NWRC stables started off the New Year pretty well ...
Started 41 starters for - 7 winners, 6 seconds, 6 thirds, 10 in the top 5 and 12 also rans ... so all in all not a too bad of a start for that group of barns.
Accruing 455 bps in the 5 barns I ran was not a bad start ... inzamam barns posting 3 winners and hoarding 114bps, whilst zinzamam had two winners but amassed 133bps, with just 2 of the 9 runners not finishing in bp bearing positions.
Hope to improve with each week and hope you all can do the same!
Rharfo
-
lilbitfarm
- Journeyman
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:30 pm
Re: How did your MWRC horses do in 4547--Good, Bad and Ugly?
hmmmm- I can't seem to find my MWRC barns so I guess I'll talk about my NWRC barns
OK week for my NWRC stables with a 21(4-5-0) combined record. My two Stakes runners failed to win but I was very happy with my two 3yo turf horses by Dylan Thomas and Henry The Navigator who finally got 9 furlongs to run and both broke their Maidens.
On to 4554!!!!!
OK week for my NWRC stables with a 21(4-5-0) combined record. My two Stakes runners failed to win but I was very happy with my two 3yo turf horses by Dylan Thomas and Henry The Navigator who finally got 9 furlongs to run and both broke their Maidens.
On to 4554!!!!!